Have you noticed how different
people effect those with whom they come in contact in different
ways? Some people just seem to look for (and thus bring out) the
best in others, while others seem to find nothing but fault in everyone
they meet. This, of course, is just another facet of human behavior
that makes the study of our specie so intriguing. However, what
I find so interesting about this phenomena isn't that it exists.
What blows me away is that so many people believe that this discrepancy
(between bringing out other's best or pointing out their worst)
seems to depend on who they are talking about.
In other words, when people
are discussing the positive or negative traits of some particular
person, they actually think that they are generating information
about someone else! Of course, there are times when a heightened
awareness of another's tendencies (either positive or negative)
can certainly be "good information" about whether we want
this person in our lives. However, I'm going to suggest that our
general tendency to be a person who brings out the best in others
or points out their worst always says much more about us than them.
This belief comes from a
quote by Neale Donald Walsch that I use in almost all of my presentations
that says, "Every thought, emotion, and action is a statement
about who we are and who we are becoming." I have added to
this, "So why not make this statement 'on purpose?" You
see, I believe that in our interactions with others, few of us are
making a purposeful statement about who we want to be. In other
words, I don't think people are waking up each morning and saying
that they looking forward to being a person who finds fault in everyone
they meet. And yet, I would also imagine that we all know people
who relate to the world from just this sort of negative perspective.
Why is this? It certainly
can't be a very effective method for creating a happy, meaningful
experience of life or creating the sort of loving, long lasting
relationships that we all desire. I'm going to suggest that the
reason these people interact this way with others in this negative
way is that they are frightened. I know, they certainly don't act
frightened in the sense that they shrink from others, in fact, they
may do just the opposite by getting in people's faces, and telling
them off every chance they get. So, why would I suggest that we
see these folks as frightened? Well, there are many reasons (most
having to do with what I have learned about how our adult personalities
are shaped by our experiences growing up and how easily our brain
goes into a fight-or-flight reaction), but the main reason I suggest
that we see difficult people as frightened versus frightening is
that this perspective allows us to avoid joining them in their negative
appraisal of others (i.e. us judging them) and allows us to define
ourselves in a more purposeful way.
In other words, I would
imagine that most of us want to define ourselves as people who bring
out the best in others, and thus seeing negative people as frightened
(versus dysfunctional, abusive, wrong, etc.) allows us to hold on
to the vision that underneath their fear is their best. This way,
when we are interacting with them, we don't have to point out that
they are wrong or bad (which, of course, they would only reject)
but instead we can see past the frightened behavior to the person
beneath the fear, and this vision can be beneficial to all concerned.
We benefit by defining ourselves "on purpose" as people
who look for the best in others, and because we are speaking to/pointing
out this "other part" of them, they have the opportunity
to benefit by shifting from their worst toward their best.
Now, of course, if they
insist in hanging on to this negative faultfinding perspective,
then we may not choose to spend much time with them because we know
that we are 100% responsible for how we create our experience of
life which, of course, includes a purposeful decision about with
whom we spend our time. The good news, however, is that just as
how they are reacting is good information for them and how we respond
to them is good information for us, removing ourselves from their
presence can also be good information about the effect they are
having on people in their lives. In fact, I would imagine if everyone
did this (removed themselves from their company when they began
their faultfinding behavior) they might reconsider whether this
persona is truly serving them.
Now, the challenge, of course,
in choosing this tact of removing ourselves is to do it in a way
that doesn't turn us into a faultfinder. This is challenging because
it is so tempting to blame them for our withdrawal. Therefore, if
defining yourself "on purpose" is important to you, I
would encourage you create a vision or image of how you might want
to look for the best in others, and if they still insist on showing
you their worst, create a plan to disengage with that part of them
while still knowing that who they really are (who they were when
they were born) is a child of God (thinking of them as a baby will
make this easier by the way). Just because they have become frightened
(and now identify with that fear that they relate to the world from
this perspective), this doesn't mean that this is who they really
are. More importantly, just because people show us their worst doesn't
mean that we must believe in their fear and begin to search for
ways to protect ourselves.
The bottom line is if we
want to define ourselves as someone who brings out the best in others,
we must first be willing to hold a vision of them at their best
and then look for opportunities to speak to this persona. Then,
if they remain frightened, we can choose to remain present (or not)
depending upon the criteria we have chosen for how we spend our
time. Regardless, however, we will be taking 100% responsibility
for defining who we are (bringing out our best) and thus creating
our experience of life in a more purposeful way.
Take care and God bless, Dr. Bill